Start with the actual proposal. Then bring the red pen.
The proposal reader is the centre of this review system. It lets readers target exact passages, attach a category and source, inspect related feedback, vote, share and export the review record.
Fund Stage 0—not a national rollout.
Parliament should fund a transparent feasibility and co-design phase to determine whether He Ara Angitū can be made safe, culturally legitimate, affordable, deliverable and worth testing in a limited pilot.
Stage 0 should produce a robust business case, safeguarding design, technical specifications, supplier evidence, independent evaluation plan and pre-published stop/scale rules.
Signing the future petition will support investigation—not blind adoption.
Follow the petition launchThe bargain
Public money should buy disciplined answers—not a promise that a citizen’s preferred design gets adopted.
- Safety gate
- Affordability gate
- Delivery gate
- Cultural legitimacy gate
- Independent evaluation gate
Choose where you want to test the argument.
Start with the part that matters to you. The full technical record remains available for readers who want to inspect the entire chain.
Proposal + passage feedback
Read the current proposal and challenge an exact paragraph or highlighted sentence in the sticky review panel.
Open proposal review → 02Financial model + passage feedback
Interrogate pessimistic and optimistic sensitivities, target exact assumptions, and follow the public financial discussion.
Open financial review → 03Evidence library
Trace sources, confidence, rights status and unresolved verification work.
Open evidence → 04Public criticism
Read support, objections and passage-specific challenges—or add your own.
Open feedback → 05Watch & learn
Use the curated video pathway to understand the surrounding evidence and debate.
Open videos → 06Project record
Track revisions, evidence work, public milestones and media engagement.
Open updates → 07Supporters
See verified organisational interest without pretending support buys control.
Open supporters → 08Downloads
Take the documents, data and model away and interrogate them elsewhere.
Open downloads → 09Sign in & follow threads
Publish contributions, vote, receive replies and choose financial, proposal or project digests.
Open account →Make criticism specific enough to be useful.
“I do not like it” is a valid reaction, but not yet a complete argument. Strong review identifies the claim, mechanism, assumption, number or safeguard that fails—and explains why.
The same standard applies to support. “This sounds good” is not evidence; supporters should show their working too.
Identify the weak bolt before a pilot reaches the road. That is more valuable than applause, dismissal or party-line reflexes.
Challenge an exact passage